這裡有一份特別有價值的資料給想買車的網友們參考，資料來源是美國最權威的消費者機構，內容是美國市場的10種可以耐用20萬英里（32萬公里）以上的車輛。這些車不但耐用，而且毛病少，安全性都符合高標準，經過保險機構測試認定，其中任何一種，都是很好的選擇。

10 Cars Proven to Get to 200,000 Miles and BeyondCR"s exclusive survey shows these sedans, SUVs, minivans, and pickup trucks are in it for the long haulBy Jeff S. BartlettLast updated: December 19, 2018

These are the top 10 problem-free models that have proved to go 200,000 miles or more, according to Consumer Reports members. Many other models in our Annual Reliability Survey reached that milestone, although they did not have as high percentage of trouble-free vehicles.

Almost any car can make it to 200,000 miles and beyond, if you spend enough money on it. But that"s not necessarily a good idea. It"s better to buy a safe and reliable model, and then properly maintain it. Make sure you follow the maintenance schedule in your owner’s manual, and take care of minor problems as they arise.

Below are the 10 cars, minivans, pickup trucks, and SUVs that Consumer Reports" survey respondents reported have reached more than 200,000 miles.

There is a clear theme on this list: Honda and Toyota models have fewer problems and go the distance more often than vehicles from other brands.

The cars that shined in this analysis certainly would be considered used cars at this point. To help new-car shoppers, we have highlighted the latest model years below, and included our findings on this most recent version. We encourage you to click through to the linked model pages, where you will find more information and pricing on both new and used cars.

Given that we"re looking at a long span of years for this analysis, shoppers should be aware that road-test scores, reliability, and other ratings vary over time.

Whether you"re buying new or used, it"s smart to check the ratings on CR"s model pages for the specific model year that you"re considering.

The vehicles below are ranked (in descending order) by the percentage of those with zero claimed problems in the previous 12 months.

No. 1 Toyota Camry

The redesigned Camry brings snazzier styling and slightly more nimble handling while retaining its comfortable, quiet demeanor. It again stands as one of the best midsized sedans. The lower stance makes access a bit more difficult, and the rear seat has lost some roominess. The standard 2.5-liter, four-cylinder engine provides ample power and gets an impressive 32 mpg overall. A 3.5-liter V6 is also available. Both are paired to a new eight-speed automatic transmission that isn"t supersmooth.

A very frugal hybrid LE gets 47 mpg overall without any sacrifice in trunk space. Standard safety equipment includes forward-collision warning (FCW) and automatic emergency braking (AEB), but blind-spot warning (BSW) is optional.

Read the complete Toyota Camry road tests.

No. 2 Honda Accord

The Accord has a coupelike silhouette and a lower stance. Two turbocharged, four-cylinder engines are available. The base version is a 1.5-liter that"s shared with the Honda CR-V SUV and the Civic compact car. The new 192-hp engine is mated to a CVT, a combination that is mostly unobtrusive and delivers adequate power. The uplevel turbocharged 2.0-liter brings 252 hp and a slick 10-speed automatic transmission but features an unintuitive push-button gear selector. The Hybrid gets an impressive 47 mpg overall without sacrificing acceleration.

The new infotainment system is a big improvement, and includes knobs for tuning and volume adjustment. Handling is responsive, and the ride is comfortable. Standard safety equipment includes FCW, AEB, lane-departure warning, and lane-keeping assist.

Read the complete Honda Accord road tests.

No. 3 Toyota Prius

In our tests the Prius returned a phenomenal 52 mpg overall, ensuring low running costs. The car handles responsively and rides comfortably. The car can drive solely on electric, usually up to about 25 mph, but acceleration is leisurely and when the engine kicks in it"s not particularly pleasant sounding. Tire noise is noticeable on coarse pavement.

Colorful digital gauges dominate the dashboard with abundant fuel-economy information. The touch-screen infotainment system is fairly straightforward. But the seats have mediocre support unless buyers spring for top trim versions. The car"s low stance makes it a challenge to get into and out of. FCW and AEB are standard but note that BSW comes only on top trim versions. New features for 2019 include optional all-wheel drive, an updated exterior, and new trim names.

Read the complete Toyota Prius road tests.

No. 4 Honda CR-V

The CR-V is one of the better models among small SUVs, thanks to its roomy cabin, good fuel economy, and competent handling. The base engine is a 184-hp, 2.4-liter four-cylinder, and EX and above trims sport a 190-hp, 1.5-liter turbo. Both are mated to a continuously variable transmission that works well. Fuel economy is impressive at 28 mpg overall for the EX.

Its handling is nimble and surefooted, and the firm ride is steady. Road noise is well-suppressed, and the cabin is reasonably quiet. The interior is very comfortable and roomy, particularly the rear seat, although the seats in the base LX are less supportive. EX and above trims get a standard 7-inch touch-screen infotainment system with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay compatibility, as well as standard AEB and BSW.

Read the complete Honda CR-V road tests.

No. 5 Toyota Sienna

As minivans go, the Sienna is a sensible choice, but it isn"t very engaging to drive. The Sienna rides comfortably and is quiet inside, but handling is lackluster. It has a lively 3.5-liter V6 but the new eight-speed automatic doesn"t shift as smoothly as the previous six-speed one did. However, the transmission helped improve fuel economy from 20 to 21 mpg. The all-wheel-drive version—the only such minivan on the market—sacrifices 1 mpg.

An eighth seat cleverly stores in the back when it isn"t installed in place. The availability of all-wheel drive is the Sienna"s biggest advantages over any other minivan. FCW, AEB, lane-departure warning with lane-keeping assist, and adaptive cruise control are standard.

Read the complete Toyota Sienna road tests.

No. 6 Honda Odyssey

The Odyssey minivan packs in refinement, quietness, fuel economy, and a relatively intuitive infotainment system. Its interior is very flexible, with the ability to slide the second-row outboard seats sideways. Several connectivity and storage features keep the entire family happy. The 280-hp, 3.5-liter V6 engine supplies ample power and is teamed with a fairly unobtrusive nine-speed automatic transmission. The top trims, Touring and Elite, get a slicker 10-speed transmission. The engine is smooth, punchy, and hushed, but there is no all-wheel-drive option.

The ride is very comfortable, the cabin is quiet, and handling is sound. However, the push-button gear selector is a nuisance to use when parking. The optional 8-inch infotainment touch screen is easier to use than the previous offering, but it can still be distracting.

Read the complete Honda Odyssey road tests.

No. 7 Toyota 4Runner

Tough and ready to tackle off-roading adventures, the 4Runner falls short of most modern SUVs. Its rough-sounding 4.0-liter V6 is powerful and reasonably fuel-efficient. But the ride is unsettled, and handling is clumsy. The body leans noticeably while cornering, and the bobbing and bouncing ride chips away at driver confidence.

A high step-in and low ceiling compromise access and driving position. There"s generous ground clearance, and underbody skid plates are standard. The part-time 4WD system includes a low range for tough off-road duty. Its controls are simple, with big buttons and knobs, but the radio touch screen is relatively small. A third-row seat is optional, and the power-retractable rear window is handy. Modern electronic safety gear such as BSW and FCW is not available.

Read the complete Toyota 4Runner road tests.

No. 8 Toyota Corolla

The Corolla delivers a comfortable ride and has a quiet, spacious interior for a compact sedan. Handling is lackluster but very secure. A sportier SE version has a tauter suspension with marginally better handling. The continuously variable transmission is fine when loafing around but can elicit loud engine noise under higher revs. Fuel economy is excellent at 32 mpg overall, and the Corolla returns 43 mpg on the highway.

Inside, padded and stitched surfaces contrast with a number of drab, hard-plastic bits. Upscale features include standard Bluetooth connectivity, automatic climate control, and a touch-screen radio with simple controls. The rear seat is one of the roomiest in the category. FCW and AEB are standard. The new Corolla hatchback features a new 2.0-liter engine with impressive fuel economy and agile handling.

Read the complete Toyota Corolla road tests.

No. 9 Toyota Highlander

The Highlander ranks among the best midsized three-row SUVs, with a desirable balance of an absorbent ride, responsive handling, and generous interior space. A third row allows seating for eight in a pinch--seven with optional second-row captain"s chairs--and folds flat easily to increase cargo space. The punchy 3.5-liter V6 engine is now matched to an eight-speed automatic. While this new transmission isn"t as smooth as the previous six-speed one, it helped improve fuel economy to 22 mpg overall. The hybrid version gets 25 mpg overall.

Drivers face a long reach to some controls, particularly the touch screen. The Entune system includes a larger 8-inch screen. A comprehensive suite of safety technology, including AEB, is standard.

Read the complete Toyota Highlander road tests.

No. 10 Toyota Tundra

Despite a freshening that brought improved controls and updates to the exterior and interior, the Tundra still feels outclassed by its newer and more refined competitors. It offers a standard two-door regular cab and two sizes of crew cabs. You can choose between a very powerful 5.7-liter V8 and a 4.6-liter V8. The six-speed automatic is very smooth and responsive.

Its handling is secure, but the ride is jittery, especially with the TRD off-road package. The cabin is very roomy, but it"s a long reach to some controls. Towing performance is extremely capable. The damped rear tailgate is easy to raise and lower. FCW, AEB, and lane-departure warning are standard.

沒有絕對的事，只能說比較省心，元器件基本都不愛壞，維修簡單，使用成本較低，帶T的就不知道了，但是真正大排自吸才是真正好車…小排量駕駛感受一般般

相對來說還是可以的。沒有不壞的車，質量上比別的品牌要強的多。至於車輛構造，有不少人說豐田皮薄。我想說一下多少錢的車和多少錢的車比，十幾萬的車和百萬左右車肯定撞不過。豐田車內的事故死亡率還是很低的!

開不壞是不可能的，不過豐田的可靠性確實要比其他車企要好，這組資料裡豐田的百車故障率是108，那108個故障都是誰修好的呢，除非豐田能把百車故障率做到0或者個位數，那他確實是開不壞，車這東西看誰開，懂車的人來開確實要比不懂車的開要省的多，如果是一個對機械一點不懂的女人開，不是亂掛擋就是拖檔開，還有開車的環境也是很大一個因素，你讓豐田天天玩越野，一會進水裡一會進泥裡，多爛的路都不減速，多深的溝都敢過，即使是PRADO也會很快就壞掉，如果正常在好路上走豐田耐用性確實還不錯，但是也有rav4車主正常駕駛發動機爆缸了，缸體漏了個大洞，這也是很個別的現象，豐田一年賣一千萬輛汽車，根據百車故障率108算，一年就是1080萬個故障，這還不算其他年份賣的，如果把前十年的車子加起來算故障，那就是一億一千零八十萬個故障，那這些故障都是誰修好的呢，難道是車主自己？買了豐田都不好意思去修理廠？所以說不要以為買了豐田就再也不用修車，我姐夫買的二手PRADO，沒開半年就賣了，換了一臺q5，他說燒機油就賣了，也太費油，還有一朋友修車的，可以說很懂車，對FIT情有獨鍾，天天在網上看優惠，買車非得買FIT不可，結果開了別人FIT一次，直接解毒了，隔音是太差了，高速太飄了，後來加錢買的Golf，他說他媽開的爽才是王道，壞了我可以修。

所以買車就買喜歡的，只要質量不是太差的那些品牌，省著點用基本都不會太差。

那個大眾，競把自己比作上帝，車常出故障，消費者上門討說法維權，那個傲慢真讓人受不了。其他不說，看看大眾的投訴量就便知一二。燒機油是它的專利，雙離合把中國消費者當成白老鼠!

在汽車行業流傳開不壞豐田，修不好的大眾這樣的說法，但是在後最後買車的時候你會發現大多數最終選擇大眾車型，這是為什麼呢？都說下豐田為世界造車，大眾造車中國，實際上大眾的設計師確實可以抓住華人的消費心裡，所以在也變便了很多的中國特供車型，目前豐田賣的最好的車型便是COROLLA和CAMRY這兩款家轎，但是實際上說開不壞的豐田並不只是指這兩款車。都誇豐田在為世界造車，為啥買車時卻選擇了大眾，只因為這幾點

原因1.實際開不壞的豐田還有另外一個名稱是這樣說的，開不壞的陸巡，修不好的路虎，所以實際上開不壞的豐田，僅是指豐田PRADO這款車，那時現在的PRADO還叫豐田霸道，憑藉強悍的動力，以及非凡越野能力，獲得這樣的稱謂，從此也給豐田的整體營銷帶來很多好處，至於修不好的大眾，僅僅是指2000年進入中國市場的PassatB5,這款車當為適應中國市場，經過很大的改動以後才進入國市場，由於點子系統當時已經被改的七零八落，所以經常會出現燒機油，電路系統短路，水箱高溫等一些故障，可以說害苦了很多人，之後便有了修不好的大眾一說，但是大眾普桑以及Jetta等車型質量卻是出了名的不錯。

原因2.，大眾車求穩，而日系車型則是希望各種方式向價達到節能減耗的目的，其實相比之下大眾車型的質量並不比日系車差，只是在很多時候並並未達到預期的目標，但是卻在不進步，相比豐田玩飢餓營銷好很多。

原因3.相比之下在同級別車型，大眾車車型的配置要比日系車型高一些，比如我們大家常見的ESP，渦輪增壓，電子手剎，一鍵啟動，等常用的功能，絕對要比日系車型高，大眾車型卻是要比日系的車型高出一到兩萬，但是大眾車型的底盤比較穩，動力上也強勁，而且質感也好一些，所以要一年跑一萬在，這種家用車型大多數人會首選大眾車型。

總結：說白了車子就是一個代步工具，蘿蔔青菜各有所愛，每個人的看法不同選擇的車型也就不同，大家可以根據自己情況進行挑選，但是還飆車的車，那日系車還真不如大眾。

豐田主要是偏重於家用。家用對車的技術要求並不高。所以豐田的實用主義讓他選擇了很多比較老舊的技術。

老舊的技術意味著穩定性。所以造就了豐田車耐用的口碑。

不管你去看豐田還是雷克薩斯。對比一下同期的賓士或者寶馬奧迪，你會發現豐田的科技感要遠遠遜於他們。這就是豐田精益生思維的延伸。滿足客戶的基本需求就可以。其他的任何增加的功能都是可能會導致產品穩定性降低。

在汽車行業流傳開不壞豐田，修不好的大眾這樣的說法，但是在後最後買車的時候你會發現大多數最終選擇大眾車型，這是為什麼呢？都說下豐田為世界造車，大眾造車中國，實際上大眾的設計師確實可以抓住華人的消費心裡，所以在也變便了很多的中國特供車型，目前豐田賣的最好的車型便是COROLLA和CAMRY這兩款家轎，但是實際上說開不壞的豐田並不只是指這兩款車。都誇豐田在為世界造車，為啥買車時卻選擇了大眾，只因為這幾點

原因1.實際開不壞的豐田還有另外一個名稱是這樣說的，開不壞的陸巡，修不好的路虎，所以實際上開不壞的豐田，僅是指豐田PRADO這款車，那時現在的PRADO還叫豐田霸道，憑藉強悍的動力，以及非凡越野能力，獲得這樣的稱謂，從此也給豐田的整體營銷帶來很多好處，至於修不好的大眾，僅僅是指2000年進入中國市場的PassatB5,這款車當為適應中國市場，經過很大的改動以後才進入國市場，由於點子系統當時已經被改的七零八落，所以經常會出現燒機油，電路系統短路，水箱高溫等一些故障，可以說害苦了很多人，之後便有了修不好的大眾一說，但是大眾普桑以及Jetta等車型質量卻是出了名的不錯。

原因2.，大眾車求穩，而日系車型則是希望各種方式向價達到節能減耗的目的，其實相比之下大眾車型的質量並不比日系車差，只是在很多時候並並未達到預期的目標，但是卻在不進步，相比豐田玩飢餓營銷好很多。

原因3.相比之下在同級別車型，大眾車車型的配置要比日系車型高一些，比如我們大家常見的ESP，渦輪增壓，電子手剎，一鍵啟動，等常用的功能，絕對要比日系車型高，大眾車型卻是要比日系的車型高出一到兩萬，但是大眾車型的底盤比較穩，動力上也強勁，而且質感也好一些，所以要一年跑一萬在，這種家用車型大多數人會首選大眾車型。

總結：說白了車子就是一個代步工具，蘿蔔青菜各有所愛，每個人的看法不同選擇的車型也就不同，大家可以根據自己情況進行挑選，但是還飆車的車，那日系車還真不如大眾。

說豐田車開不壞主要是三大件，發動機，變速箱，和底盤的故障率極低，技術成熟了

其實每個車生產出來都有個機率在，一般的品牌車可能在生產10萬臺裡面有個10幾臺的故障機率學在。

而豐田麼可能10萬臺裡面故障率可能就小几臺。再者豐田保有量大，賣的多加故障率低，所以保持了比較好的口碑，所以才有開不壞的豐田在

日系車麼大家也都知道可能車身稍微薄了點，都是三大件，故障率真的是很低，而且油耗也比較省，所以對比普通老百姓來說，還是非常適合家用的，日產代代步還是非常不錯的。

以個人對汽車瞭解，以及從事二手車行業接觸各類品牌車型，給您解答，豐田等日系車等核心技術就是在發動機變速箱上，日本是個小國家資源能源有限，所以他們生產汽車都是在節能減排技術上下了很大功夫，這就是日系車省油原由，但是日本本土生產的日系車質量用料都是厚道，但是引進中國產合資之後在材料配置等方面就偷工減料了，但是發動機變速箱質量沒有任何問題。我之前收過一臺05年的VIOS跟07年的COROLLA，都是十幾年的車齡，公里數都在十幾萬公里，開啟機蓋，發動機變速箱滴油不漏，非常乾爽，螺絲都沒有動過一顆。試駕的時候除了底盤有點硬，鬆動，非常省油，動力一點也不比現在新車弱，一個故障燈也沒有，導致日系車裡豐田車較為保值。而且我老婆開的馬自達，年審的時候尾氣都是一把透過，相對於其他品牌的車，日系車年審尾氣好透過一些也是給自己省事。希望對你有幫助，望採納。

在汽車行業流傳開不壞豐田，修不好的大眾這樣的說法，但是在後最後買車的時候你會發現大多數最終選擇大眾車型，這是為什麼呢？都說下豐田為世界造車，大眾造車中國，實際上大眾的設計師確實可以抓住華人的消費心裡，所以在也變便了很多的中國特供車型，目前豐田賣的最好的車型便是COROLLA和CAMRY這兩款家轎，但是實際上說開不壞的豐田並不只是指這兩款車。都誇豐田在為世界造車，為啥買車時卻選擇了大眾，只因為這幾點

原因1.實際開不壞的豐田還有另外一個名稱是這樣說的，開不壞的陸巡，修不好的路虎，所以實際上開不壞的豐田，僅是指豐田PRADO這款車，那時現在的PRADO還叫豐田霸道，憑藉強悍的動力，以及非凡越野能力，獲得這樣的稱謂，從此也給豐田的整體營銷帶來很多好處，至於修不好的大眾，僅僅是指2000年進入中國市場的PassatB5,這款車當為適應中國市場，經過很大的改動以後才進入國市場，由於點子系統當時已經被改的七零八落，所以經常會出現燒機油，電路系統短路，水箱高溫等一些故障，可以說害苦了很多人，之後便有了修不好的大眾一說，但是大眾普桑以及Jetta等車型質量卻是出了名的不錯。

原因2.，大眾車求穩，而日系車型則是希望各種方式向價達到節能減耗的目的，其實相比之下大眾車型的質量並不比日系車差，只是在很多時候並並未達到預期的目標，但是卻在不進步，相比豐田玩飢餓營銷好很多。

原因3.相比之下在同級別車型，大眾車車型的配置要比日系車型高一些，比如我們大家常見的ESP，渦輪增壓，電子手剎，一鍵啟動，等常用的功能，絕對要比日系車型高，大眾車型卻是要比日系的車型高出一到兩萬，但是大眾車型的底盤比較穩，動力上也強勁，而且質感也好一些，所以要一年跑一萬在，這種家用車型大多數人會首選大眾車型。

總結：說白了車子就是一個代步工具，蘿蔔青菜各有所愛，每個人的看法不同選擇的車型也就不同，大家可以根據自己情況進行挑選，但是還飆車的車，那日系車還真不如大眾。

有句話說的好：全靠同行襯托。

什麼意思？豐田汽車的質量好主要是其它品牌質量太爛對比出來的，理論上來說，豐田現有的產品質量才是成熟的大型汽車企業起碼該有的質量和品質，這應該是一個基礎標準，如果誰想做的更優秀更精緻請做的更突出，比如雷克薩斯那樣的……

但事實上呢？同樣的合資品牌同樣的車型，上到豪華品牌賓士，下到普通品牌起亞，你們看看在中國生產的汽車質量是什麼玩意？

那賓士怪大家罵它麼？你可是頂級豪華品牌，對你要求更高也是合理，何況消費者沒有更高的要求，事實上普通品牌的質量還達不到吧？至少在品控和質量上很顯然做不到豐田的級別。

那起亞汽車就更不用說了，那叫什麼玩意？是拿眾泰做競爭對手嗎？現在沒人買是怪大家看不起南韓麼？最可氣的是它不是不能做好，它在美國銷售的車輛就做的價格又低品質又好，還很受美華人民喜愛……這是玩啥雙標呢？

事實上不是豐田開不爛品質好，是隻有豐田在全球按同一標準生產了，沒特意擺爛而已！