the EP academy 月相錶, or even the Dunhill el primero）普遍認為真力時手錶用的是自家機芯，產品質量穩定，走時精準。價效比高。可見原文（Depends on which watches you are comparing. You may find a better movement for less outlay in a zenith but you may not like the way the watch looks. As alluded to above a c.2000 Zenith like the EP academy moonphase, or even the Dunhill el primero, offers rarity and quality movements but they both look like rejected Tag designs. Their time will come though...no doubt.）配圖（真力時 EP academy和Dunhill el primero)
而萬國多使用ETA機芯進行改造打磨，近幾年萬國的質量相對較差，原文是（You will be paying a lot more cash for a decent IWC than either of the above but you won"t get anything as interesting inside.Can"t really make a sweeping statement about brand mechanical quality though...because each watch is different and they change over the years.）價格虛高，價效比低。他們認為手錶外觀設計萬國優於真力時，同時肯定真力時外觀也在不斷的進步。當然也有人認為萬國3536 Aquatimer，或IWC Deep下配圖(萬國3536 Aquatimer，和IWC Deep）
為回答這個問題我特意查看了一些國外的手錶論壇，我只有一款萬國沒有真力時，即便有一塊真力時我也不能就他倆的對比看作是兩個品牌的對比以偏概全，而且國內同時擁有這兩個品牌手錶並出來評論的更是寥寥無幾，所以我就檢視國外的手錶論壇。以下是我對論壇評論的歸納和總結。
單純就這兩個品牌而言，基本相當。但更多表友推崇真力時特別是2000年左右出產的（
the EP academy 月相錶, or even the Dunhill el primero）普遍認為真力時手錶用的是自家機芯，產品質量穩定，走時精準。價效比高。可見原文（Depends on which watches you are comparing. You may find a better movement for less outlay in a zenith but you may not like the way the watch looks. As alluded to above a c.2000 Zenith like the EP academy moonphase, or even the Dunhill el primero, offers rarity and quality movements but they both look like rejected Tag designs. Their time will come though...no doubt.）配圖（真力時 EP academy和Dunhill el primero)
而萬國多使用ETA機芯進行改造打磨，近幾年萬國的質量相對較差，原文是（You will be paying a lot more cash for a decent IWC than either of the above but you won"t get anything as interesting inside.Can"t really make a sweeping statement about brand mechanical quality though...because each watch is different and they change over the years.）價格虛高，價效比低。他們認為手錶外觀設計萬國優於真力時，同時肯定真力時外觀也在不斷的進步。當然也有人認為萬國3536 Aquatimer，或IWC Deep下配圖(萬國3536 Aquatimer，和IWC Deep）