Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
第一步：仔細審題，列出自己的寫作提綱。如：
Para 1: 背景知識+題目改寫+表達觀點
Para 2: 同意/不同意的原因（以不同意為例）
①提高油價的辦法只對少部分的窮人有效，因為富人不在乎多出的油價，他們仍舊會繼續使用私家車。
Para 3: 其它有效的方法
①鼓勵人們使用公共交通
②建造更多更寬的路
Para 4:總結
第二步：通讀範文，總結文章的提綱，與自己的版本進行核對。如：
Para 1：引出話題+表達觀點
Para 2：不同意的原因
①油價提升不能長遠地抑制私家車的數量。
Para 3：解決汙染的有效方法：開發新能源+說服制造商和出行者生產和使用清潔能源驅動的車
Para 4：解決交通堵塞的有效方法：改善可供出行者使用的公共交通服務（建立和維護足夠的輕軌和地鐵系統+使長途列車和汽車更具吸引力）
Para 5：總結
對比後，可積累範文提綱中不同意的原因②，且會發現自己的提綱中未包含解決汙染問題的方法，可進行改進。
第三步：精讀範文，積累好詞（同意替換+其他表達）並背誦，如：
increasing the price of petrol=a rise in the price of petrol=higher fuel costs
be likely to do sth. 很有可能做某事
affect v. 影響
public transport 公共交通
implement v. 實施
have a huge effect on 對……有巨大的影響
tackle v. 解決
……
第四步：精讀範文，積累好句+背誦
There is no doubt that+句子 毫無疑問的是
It is undeniable that+句子 不可否認的是
As this policy would also affect the cost of public transport, it would be very unpopular with everyone who needs to travel on the roads. (as引導原因狀語從句)
……
第五步：複述全文（可偶爾藉助中文翻譯）
C8T3T2 Model Answer
There is no doubt that traffic and pollution from vehicles have become huge problems, both in cities and on motorways everywhere. Solving these problems is likely to need more than a simple rise in the price of petrol.
While it is undeniable that private car use is one of the main causes of the increase in traffic and pollution, higher fuel costs are unlikely to limit the number of drivers for long. As this policy would also affect the cost of public transport, it would be very unpopular with everyone who needs to travel on the roads. But there are various other measures that would be implemented that would have a huge effect on these problems.
I think to tackle the problem of pollution; cleaner fuels need to be developed. The technology is already available to produce electric cars that would be both quieter and cleaner to use. Persuading manufacturers and travelers to adopt this new technology would be a more effective strategy for improving air quality, especially in cities.
However, traffic congestion will not be solved by changing the type of private vehicle people can use. To do this, we need to improve the choice of public transport services available to travelers. For example, if sufficient sky trains and underground train systems were built and effectively maintained in our major cities, then traffic on the roads would be dramatically reduced. Long-distance train and coach services should be made attractive and affordable alternatives to driving your own car for long journeys.
In conclusion, I think that long-term traffic and pollution reductions would depend on educating the public to use public transport more, and on governments using public money to construct and run efficient systems.
雅思寫作高分範文是各位烤鴨們在備考寫作過程中重要的參考資料，在C4-C13這10本書中，有關Task 2的範文僅14篇，數量之少令人惋惜，因此烤鴨們更應該充分利用。接下來就一起以C8T3T2為例來學習研習高分範文的步驟吧。
題幹如下：
Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
第一步：仔細審題，列出自己的寫作提綱。如：
Para 1: 背景知識+題目改寫+表達觀點
Para 2: 同意/不同意的原因（以不同意為例）
①提高油價的辦法只對少部分的窮人有效，因為富人不在乎多出的油價，他們仍舊會繼續使用私家車。
Para 3: 其它有效的方法
①鼓勵人們使用公共交通
②建造更多更寬的路
Para 4:總結
第二步：通讀範文，總結文章的提綱，與自己的版本進行核對。如：
Para 1：引出話題+表達觀點
Para 2：不同意的原因
①油價提升不能長遠地抑制私家車的數量。
Para 3：解決汙染的有效方法：開發新能源+說服制造商和出行者生產和使用清潔能源驅動的車
Para 4：解決交通堵塞的有效方法：改善可供出行者使用的公共交通服務（建立和維護足夠的輕軌和地鐵系統+使長途列車和汽車更具吸引力）
Para 5：總結
對比後，可積累範文提綱中不同意的原因②，且會發現自己的提綱中未包含解決汙染問題的方法，可進行改進。
第三步：精讀範文，積累好詞（同意替換+其他表達）並背誦，如：
increasing the price of petrol=a rise in the price of petrol=higher fuel costs
be likely to do sth. 很有可能做某事
affect v. 影響
public transport 公共交通
implement v. 實施
have a huge effect on 對……有巨大的影響
tackle v. 解決
……
第四步：精讀範文，積累好句+背誦
There is no doubt that+句子 毫無疑問的是
It is undeniable that+句子 不可否認的是
As this policy would also affect the cost of public transport, it would be very unpopular with everyone who needs to travel on the roads. (as引導原因狀語從句)
……
第五步：複述全文（可偶爾藉助中文翻譯）
C8T3T2 Model Answer
There is no doubt that traffic and pollution from vehicles have become huge problems, both in cities and on motorways everywhere. Solving these problems is likely to need more than a simple rise in the price of petrol.
While it is undeniable that private car use is one of the main causes of the increase in traffic and pollution, higher fuel costs are unlikely to limit the number of drivers for long. As this policy would also affect the cost of public transport, it would be very unpopular with everyone who needs to travel on the roads. But there are various other measures that would be implemented that would have a huge effect on these problems.
I think to tackle the problem of pollution; cleaner fuels need to be developed. The technology is already available to produce electric cars that would be both quieter and cleaner to use. Persuading manufacturers and travelers to adopt this new technology would be a more effective strategy for improving air quality, especially in cities.
However, traffic congestion will not be solved by changing the type of private vehicle people can use. To do this, we need to improve the choice of public transport services available to travelers. For example, if sufficient sky trains and underground train systems were built and effectively maintained in our major cities, then traffic on the roads would be dramatically reduced. Long-distance train and coach services should be made attractive and affordable alternatives to driving your own car for long journeys.
In conclusion, I think that long-term traffic and pollution reductions would depend on educating the public to use public transport more, and on governments using public money to construct and run efficient systems.
範文翻譯：
毫無疑問，在城市和各地的高速公路上，機動車造成的交通和汙染問題已經變得相當嚴重。要解決這些問題需要的很可能不只是提高油價。
無可否認，私家車的使用是交通和汙染問題增加的主要原因之一，但提升燃油價格不太可能長期限制駕車人的數量。由於這一政策也會影響到公共交通的花費，因此它將非常不受所有需要在公路上行駛的人歡迎。但是還有各種其他的措施，一旦實施，即會對這些問題產生巨大影響。
我認為要解決汙染問題需要開發更清潔的燃料。我們已經擁有可以用來製造更安靜、更清潔的電動汽車的技術。說服廠商和出行者採用這一新技術會是改進空氣質量,尤其是城市中的空氣質量的更有效的策略。
然而，交通擁堵的問題不會透過改變人們能使用的私家車的種類來解決。為了解決這個問題，我們需要改進出行者所能得到的公共交通服務的選擇。比如，如果在主要城市中能夠建造並有效維護充足的高架列車和地鐵系統，那麼公路.上的交通將會急劇減少。長途列車和長途公共汽車應該成為自駕長途旅行的價廉物美的替代性選擇。
總之，我認為長期緩解交通和汙染問題有賴於教育公眾更多地使用公共交通工具,有賴於政府使用公共資金建造和運營有效的公交系統。