現在好像是看臉時代，越漂亮越受歡迎。論文也不例外，很多人都追逐漂亮的圖形，把大部分時間和精力放在繪圖上。但是有時候圖片太漂亮了，可能也是一種錯。例如有位粉絲可能因為圖片太漂亮了，而論文被拒稿。具體審稿意見如下：

#Reviewer 2

The pictures of GO and KEGG in this article are very beautiful. However, the important part of thearticle is not GO enrichment analysis and KEGG enrichment analysis, but construction Cox regression model. The picture of lasso regression is very important, which is related to how the author selects factors, but the author did not give it. In addition, the author did not give a Univariate Cox regression result. It can be seen that the author spends most of his time and energy on drawing beautiful pictures (GO and KEGG), which is not of much use, but ignores the important part of the article. Therefore, the conclusion of this article is not very reliable and is not suitable for acceptance and publication.

從上面審稿人的意見來看，審稿人說得是有一定的道理。作者沒有把握住文章的重點部分，沒有給出lasso 迴歸相關的圖。但是也不至於拒稿呀，而是應該小修或者大修補上相關的圖和結果。可是令人遺憾的是，主編就根據第二個審稿人的意見進行了拒稿。難道就是因為審稿人嫉妒圖片太漂亮而進行拒稿？難道審稿人就沒有體會到作者繪圖的用心和艱苦？