小說裡，漫畫裡，電影裡，經常會有兩方打鬥的情節，往往主角方的人都是正義的，為了世界，為了百姓啥的，在觀眾看來，與主角對立的一方也就是反派，是邪惡的象徵。但其實很多作品中也會寫到反派的過去，反派之所以成為反派往往都是有原因的，也就是可恨之人必有可憐之處。這種角色一般都有一種悲劇色彩在裡面。

主角一定是正派，正派就一定完全正義，對立方一定是反派，反派一定完全邪惡，不可饒恕，這種設定太不真實了，現在的小說，動漫都會選擇更真實的設定，對立方不一定是邪惡的，有可能只是立場不同，但都是在守護自己的正義，還有的反派並不想成為反派，只是生活所迫，或者對所處的黑暗世界絕望，然後想要毀掉世界。

接下來我將會舉幾個經典反派作為例子來講述反派的世界。

首先是美杜莎，人人都知道的蛇髮女妖，只要盯著她的眼睛就會被石化，這樣一個看起來就是邪惡的惡魔，在羅馬神話裡卻是個可憐十足的角色，她本是雅典娜神廟裡的一名祭祀，長相絕美，是一個可以令神都為之傾倒的大美人，可是在某一天她在給雅典娜奉上祭品的時候，被海神波塞冬撞見，波塞冬看見美杜莎的時候瞬間便起了邪念，於是在神廟裡強暴了美杜莎，在波塞冬走後，雅典娜現身，看見美杜莎非但沒有任何同情，還認為她已失去了處女之身，卻還待在她（處女神）的神廟是對她的侮辱，於是懲罰她變為女妖，被世人追殺，美杜莎到底做錯了什麼？我不太明白，因為長得美嗎？最後美杜莎被珀耳修斯為了完成任務殺死了。

然後是一部動漫《斬.赤紅之瞳》，裡面的主角方是刺客一方，為了毀滅一個已經腐敗的國家到處刺殺重要人物，對立方則是國家的騎士團，兩方廝殺，最後主角團只剩下了一個人，對立方死光了，但是這兩方有任何一方出問題了嗎，一邊看著腐敗的國家在迫害人民不得已出手毀滅，另一方為了保護自己的家人而戰鬥，他們廝殺的原因僅僅是立場不同而已，沒有好壞之分，就像某些戰爭的發生一樣，出問題的，是高層，而不是浴血奮戰的戰士們。

有時候現實可能和上述場景有類似的地方，美杜莎是受害者，最後落得如此下場，為什麼呢，因為她成為女妖后危及到了人類，為了保護人類，完成任務，珀爾修斯殺了她，跟《斬.赤紅之瞳》有部分相似，看起來美杜莎的報復是真的很正常的，但是珀爾修斯還是必須殺了她，就想《斬.赤紅之瞳》裡面的主角團，為了消滅腐敗的國家，不得不殺掉明知不是壞人的騎士團，究其原因，真的是立場，為了保護一些必須要保護的東西。說的更深刻一些，是為了保護普通人們，也就是說，如果有人危及到了百姓們，總會有人站出來消滅他，不管他曾經怎樣，或許他曾經，是人民的英雄。

我想說，我不覺得美杜莎不該死，不管她曾經如何，但是她現在危及到了百姓，如

果沒有勸回的機會，那就必須殺了她，但是同樣，她死後，如果是我，我一定為她立碑，悼念她，如果人民出現了其他敵人，就算他是個英雄，我也必須殺掉你，在你死後，為你悼念。

你是英雄，但我必須殺了你，我也會在你死後悼念你。

In novels, comics, movies, there are often two sides of the fight plot, often the protagonist Fang people are just, for the world, for the people and so on, in the audience's view, the opposite side of the protagonist is the villain, is a symbol of evil. But in fact, many works will also write about the past of villains, the reason why villains become villains is often for a reason, that is, hateful people must have pity. This character generally has a tragic color in it.

The protagonist must be decent, decent must be completely just, the opposing party must be a villain, the villain must be completely evil, unforgivable, this kind of setting is too untrue, now the novel, animation will choose a more real setting, the opposite side is not necessarily evil, may just stand different, but are guarding their own justice, Some villains do not want to be villains, just life forced, or the dark world in despair, and then want to destroy the world.

Next, I will give some classic villains as examples to tell the world of villains.

First of all, Medusa, the snake-haired banshee that everyone knew, was petrified by staring at her eyes, a demon that looked evil, but a poor character in Roman mythology, who was a sacrifice in the Temple of Athena, a beautiful beauty that could make God fall for it, but one day she was caught by the sea god Poseidon, who saw Medusa instantly, and raped Medusa in the temple. After Poseidon left, Athena, not only appeared to see Medusa without any sympathy, She also thought that she had lost her virginity, but still stayed in her temple is an insult to her, so punish her into a banshee, was hunted down by the world, Medusa did what is wrong? I don't quite understand, because it's beautiful? At last Medusa was killed by Perseus for the task.

Then there is an animation, Chopping. Red pupil, the main character is the assassin side, in order to destroy an already corrupt country everywhere assassinate important people, the opposite side is the national knight regiment, the two sides fight, finally the main character regiment left only one person, the opposite side died, but either side has the problem, while watching the corrupt country persecutes the people to destroy, the other side fights to protect their families, they fight only because of different positions, no good or bad, just like some wars, the problem is the high level, not the bloody soldiers.

Sometimes the reality may be similar to the scene, Medusa is the victim, and finally ended up like this, why, because she became a banshee after the danger to mankind, in order to protect mankind, to complete the task, Perseus killed her ,per.

Red Pupil is partly similar, and it seems that Medusa's revenge is really normal, but Perseus still has to kill her, just like Chopping. In order to eliminate the corrupt country, the leading group in the red pupil has to kill the knights who know that they are not bad people. The reason is really the position, in order to protect some things that must be protected. More profound is to protect ordinary people, that is, if someone endangers the people, someone will always come forward to destroy him, no matter what he has been, perhaps he was a hero of the people.

I want to say, I don't think Medusa should die, no matter what she used to be, but she now endangers the people, and if there is no chance of persuasion, she must be killed, but again, after her death, if it were me, I must stand up for her and mourn her. If the people have other enemies, even if he is a hero, I must kill you and mourn for you after your death.

You are a hero, but I must kill you, and I will mourn you after your death.